Channel 4 condemned for comedian’s race ‘satire’

Comedian Frankie Boyle

Channel 4 has been condemned after comedian Frankie Boyle used both the terms “Nigger” and “Paki” in his comedy programme Tramadol Nights.

An episode of Tramadol Nights, which was aired this Tuesday on Channel 4, included comedian Frankie Boyle using racially offensive terms such as “Nigger” and “Paki” in his comedy sketches.

The comedy programme is already being investigated by broadcasting watchdog OFCOM after Boyle mocked model Katie Price’s disabled son, however Boyle’s so called race satire is merely one of a number of offensive race incidents to occur on television lately.

Satire or racism?

Controversial comedy and comedians has always involved sensitive cultural, political, racial and religious issues but certain groups it seems are favoured by comedians over others.

You will find it difficult to find a single British comedian who focuses on Jewish people, or use anti Semitic terms in their humour on British television but it seems black and ethnic minority groups have become regular fodder for comedians; and what is described as ‘satire’ by television bosses can be racism disguised as comedy.

In 2004 Pan African Human Rights organisation, Ligali complained to the BBC about a drama broadcasted on Radio 4 called Alison and Maude on Radio 4. Written by Dave Lamb, the character ‘Ethel’ played by June Brown, known to many as the famous ‘Dot’ in Eastenders says, “African children, Well that’s different, there’s far too many of them horrible little things in the world, we ought to strangle them at birth [to] stop them coming over here in their thousands when they grow up. [They] look like horrible little monkeys the lot of them. Little chocolate monsters, munching on bananas all day, make my flesh crawl.” (Ligali: September 1, 2004)

This was suppose to be a comedy and ‘Ethel’ says this despite describing children as “…the most precious thing in the world.” Apparently, she meant white children in the context of the drama.

When Ligali complained to the BBC, the BBC responded with this statement, “And in what “Radio Times” said about the play you mention, the unacceptable nature of Ethel’s views was made clear; she was described as “lovely but racist”, and I’d be very surprised if this wasn’t also made clear in the drama itself.”

Imagine if the BBC had wrote this about a Nazi who wanted all Jewish children strangled at birth? Would that be comedy? Have you ever seen a Nazi character described as “lovely”?

The racially offensive comedy of the late Bernard Manning and programmes like Love thy Neighbour with the famous racist character “Alf Garnett”, expressed the racist attitudes of British people through humour and today’s comedy is no different.

In February 2009 Carol Thatcher, daughter of former Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher was sacked from the BBC after referring to a French mixed race tennis player as a “golliwog”. She claimed it was a joke.

In October 2009 anti racist campaigners called for Anton De Beke to be sacked by the BBC’s Strictly Come Dancing show after he referred to his dance partner Laila Rouass as a “Paki” and a terrorist.

Du Beke was overheard by at least 15 other people referring to former Footballer Wives’ actress Laila Rouass as a “Paki” when she had put on a spray tan. De Beke claimed that his comment was said in jest and apologised for any offence caused.

There seems to be a pattern of racist comments being referred to as humour and this is simply unacceptable.

When comedy challenges inequality and racial stereotypes it brings out the best of the genre but when it is used to merely reinforce existing inequalities and racist stereotypes comedy suffers in general.

For further research:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1340974/New-Channel-4-race-row-Frankie-Boyle-Asian-slur-N-word-antics.html?ITO=1490

http://www.ligali.org/article.php?id=7

http://www.ligali.org/pdf/BBC_ECU_alison_maud_racist.pdf

http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2009/feb/06/carol-thatcher-multiple-golliwog-remarks

http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/top-stories/2009/10/05/anton-du-beke-should-be-sacked-after-paki-comment-say-anti-racism-campaigners-115875-21723171/



Print pagePDF pageEmail page

This entry was posted in Entertainment and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to Channel 4 condemned for comedian’s race ‘satire’

  1. Jupitar says:

    I doubt June Brown would have got involved in this unless the character was supposed to represent something very unsavoury, in order to make a point. I didn’t hear the play, but I doubt it was meant to further the cause of imbecile BNP supporters and the like. I hope it was making a point about racism. There’s no need, currently, to write about anti-semitism, as Jewish people have mainly been absorbed into the mainstream. They are basically seen as ‘white’ now, whereas during the war they were seen as ‘black’ by Hitler, while their persecution was at a horrible height.

  2. Jupitar says:

    But at the same time, we as non-whites, need to ask why we get so offended by racial slurs from whites. After all, they will never be offended by a non-white calling them a ‘honky’. They might pretend they are, but this is only part of the perversion which is going on, where whites try to twist it so that they can claim racial discrimination themselves.

    At the end of the day, no white person can ever feel offended by a non-white saying something about their race, because they have only ever been taught to feel that they are superior. Yet non-whites feel insulted if a white person calls them a nigger.

    Why the hell don’t we just say ‘Oh yes, I am a nigger, just like 87% of the human race who isn’t classified as white, is a nigger?’ 87% of our species is a nigger according to white supremacy, so ok, why not? lol

  3. Jupitar says:

    Just remember, that whites’ identity is totally bound to the idea of non-whites. The idea of ‘white’ can’t exist without the idea of ‘black’. And white identity exists on the idea that there are blacks or at least non-whites, their whole sense of prestige depends upon the presumption that there are non-whites who are lower than them. They think that only they truly represent the human race, and that other races are some kind of degeneration. Not all of them obviously, but that’s the prevailing theme. And it’s absolute sh*t.

    According to white supremacy, the human species is supposed to be made up of some hugely advanced, beautiful beings, and then the ugly, useless rest who are massively degenerate.

    What a bizarre species then? A species where some are wonderfully advanced, and others face poverty worse than a lot of animals.

    It just can’t have any basis in reality can it? It can’t have anything to do do with power relations at all…no it just can’t. That Europeans went around the world securing resources for themselves and at the same time painting themselves as the only real humans and others worthy of nothing. Yet Western society perpetuates this absurdity, that the human species is so absurdly split.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *